Provided by: nmh_1.8-1build4_amd64 bug

NAME

       sortm - sort nmh messages

SYNOPSIS


       sortm [-help] [-version] [+folder] [msgs] [-all | -noall] [-datefield field] [-textfield field]
            [-notextfield] [-limit days] [-nolimit] [-check | -nocheck] [-verbose | -noverbose]

DESCRIPTION

       sortm  sorts  the  specified  messages  in  the  named folder according to the chronological order of the
       “Date:” field of each message.

       If no messages are specified, the default is all messages in the folder.  However,  if  no  messages  are
       specified  and  the -noall switch is enabled, then sortm reports that as an error and exits with non-zero
       status.  -noall is most useful in the user's profile, to avoid inadvertent sorting of an  entire  folder.
       The  -all  switch can then be used on the command line to disable it.  Of course, a message specification
       of all can be used in any case.

       The -verbose switch directs sortm to tell the user the general actions that it is  taking  to  place  the
       folder in sorted order.

       The -datefield field switch tells sortm the name of the field to use when making the date comparison.  If
       the  user  has  a  special  field  in  each  message,  such as “BB-Posted:” or “Delivery-Date:”, then the
       -datefield switch can be used to direct sortm which field to examine.

       The -textfield field switch causes sortm to sort messages by the specified text  field.   All  characters
       except  letters and numbers are stripped and the resulting strings are sorted datefield-major, textfield-
       minor, using a case insensitive comparison.  If this field is “subject”, any leading  "re:"  is  stripped
       off.

       With  -textfield  field,  if  -limit  days is specified, messages with the same textfields that are dated
       within `days' of each other appear together.  Specifying -nolimit makes the limit infinity.  With  -limit
       0, the sort is instead simply textfield-major.

       For  example,  to  order a folder by date-major, grouping messages with the same subject on the same date
       together, use:

            sortm -textfield subject +folder

       sortm always issues a warning for each message that is missing a “Date:” field, has a “Date:” field  that
       cannot  be parsed, or has a format error in any header field.  With the -check switch, sortm inhibits all
       modifications to the folder if there are any such messages, and exits with  non-zero  status.   With  the
       default  of  -nocheck,  sortm  sorts  messages  with  a missing or invalid “Date:” field using their file
       modification times.

       When ordering messages based on their dates, if they have the same dates, their original message order is
       preserved.

FILES

       $HOME/.mh_profile          The user profile

PROFILE COMPONENTS

       Path:                To determine the user's nmh directory
       Current-Folder:      To find the default current folder

SEE ALSO

       folder(1)

DEFAULTS

       `+folder' defaults to the current folder
       `msgs' defaults to all without -noall, has no default with -noall
       `-all'
       `-datefield' defaults to date
       `-notextfield'
       `-noverbose'
       `-nolimit'
       `-nocheck'

CONTEXT

       If a folder is given, it will become the current folder.  If the current message  is  moved,  sortm  will
       preserve its status as current.

HISTORY

       Timezones used to be ignored when comparing dates: they aren't any more.

       Messages  which  were  in  the  folder,  but  not specified by `msgs', used to be moved to the end of the
       folder; now such messages are left untouched.

       sortm sometimes did not preserve the message numbering in a folder (e.g., messages 1,  3,  and  5,  might
       have  been  renumbered  to  1, 2, 3 after sorting).  This was a bug, and has been fixed.  To compress the
       message numbering in a folder, use “folder -pack” as always.

BUGS

       When sortm complains about a message which it can't temporally order,  it  complains  about  the  message
       number prior to sorting.  It should indicate what the message number will be after sorting.

nmh-1.8                                            2014-03-23                                         SORTM(1mh)